“Intelligence is nothing without accurate retrieval and secure boundaries.”
I lead the strategy and architecture of retrieval-heavy AI systems under enterprise constraints: quality, security, data sovereignty, cost, and operability.
My foundation is more than a decade of search engineering across Lucene, Solr, Elasticsearch, and OpenSearch. Today I apply that experience to grounded RAG, agent platforms, local inference, AI evaluation, and secure data boundaries.
I think about enterprise AI through three connected constraints: Scale, Sovereignty, and Security.
| Constraint | Architecture question |
|---|---|
| Scale | Will retrieval quality, latency, cost, and operations hold up beyond a prototype? |
| Sovereignty | Where may data and inference run, and what leaves each trust boundary? |
| Security | How do identity, tenancy, testing, auditability, and adversarial failure shape the design? |
- AI platform strategy: reference architectures, build-vs-buy decisions, provider portability, governance, and technical roadmaps.
- Production architecture: retrieval, evaluation, observability, identity boundaries, failure modes, and cost-aware model routing.
- Engineering organisations: technical direction, architecture reviews, reusable platform patterns, and mentoring senior and principal engineers.
- Applied R&D: production-shaped prototypes that expose trade-offs before an organisation commits to a platform.
My professional work includes centralised RAG and search ecosystems, provider-neutral model gateways spanning managed and local inference, distributed tracing for agent flows, and lexical-to-hybrid search transformations. Employer-specific implementation details and metrics are intentionally generalised here.
The hands-on foundation includes relevance engineering, multi-region search, JVM/GC tuning, Lucene segment behaviour, and operational debugging under load.
| Project | Question it explores | What is inspectable |
|---|---|---|
| forgetest | How should coding-agent regressions be evaluated without trusting the model’s narrative? | Execution-backed grading, bounded traces, a calibrated Rust task corpus, CI, explicit non-claims, and a versioned release |
| encrypted-information-retrieval | What does tenant-scoped encrypted retrieval protect—and what does it still leak? | Threat-oriented design, OIDC/KMS paths, audit records, benchmarks, and an explicit evidence ledger |
| adaptive-knowledge-graph | When does graph-aware retrieval improve an adaptive-learning loop? | Neo4j + OpenSearch prototype, local-model path, citations, architecture notes, and an evaluation harness |
| flavours-of-elastic | How do lexical, dense, and hybrid retrieval trade quality for latency and complexity? | Reproducible BM25/dense/RRF examples, evaluation code, CI, and candid benchmark boundaries |
| ctf-kit | How can an AI assistant support repeatable, authorised CTF work? | Installable CLI/plugin, category-specific workflows, security-tool integrations, tests, and CI |
Current product bet: whystack, an evidence-backed workspace for architecture decisions. It is currently a walking skeleton; the next public milestone is a complete decision journey from constraints and evidence to a reviewable recommendation and ADR.
Search is not a recent addition to my AI profile. Information Retrieval Adventure records work across Lucene, Solr, Elasticsearch, custom analysers, scoring, faceting, and automated version verification. That history shapes how I approach RAG: corpus design, relevance, permissions, latency, and observability matter at least as much as the model call.
I maintain active CTF practice and use small “Danger Zone” experiments as applied-research sandboxes: places to test emerging tools, failure modes, and security assumptions before promoting a pattern into serious architecture. These are experiments, not production claims.
- Evidence before claims. Benchmarks need inspectable environments, datasets, methods, and limitations.
- Retrieval is a system. Relevance, grounding, latency, access control, cost, and failure handling belong in the same decision.
- Trust boundaries are architecture. Identity, tenancy, data movement, model providers, and observability are first-class concerns.
- Portability is earned through interfaces and tests. Provider abstraction without behavioural evaluation merely moves lock-in.
- Prototypes should expose the production path. State what is real, what is simulated, and what evidence is still missing.
- Panel host: Innovation Day 2025, “AI Made Real,” Brussels
- Python Generators for Search Engines — Summer Python Meetup
- Deploying Solr in Multi-Region Environments — Apache Lucene/Solr London
- Effective Molecule Search in Elasticsearch — Cambridge Cheminformatics & Zed Conference
- Browser Fingerprinting and Privacy — Privacy research
- CTF Competitions — Codeberry Club
