docs(less5): correct module support status - #4545
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: less/less.js/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
| | Sibling / relative `@import` | ✅ | ✅ | | | ||
| | Remote (`http(s)`) imports | ✅ | ⏳ | Gated behind an explicit network policy; not on by default. | | ||
| | `@use` / `@compose` modules | ➖ | ⏳ | Member access (namespaced functions/mixins) designed, not yet wired. | | ||
| | `@compose` stylesheet modules | ➖ | ✅ | Isolated, non-transitive modules with inferred or explicit namespaces, `as *`, and per-edge `with` or shared `set` configuration. See the [canonical Modules and Imports source](https://github.com/jesscss/jess/blob/dev/packages/docs/docs-content/docs/shared/02-Language/14-modules-and-imports.mdx). | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new shipped @compose row is not covered by the alpha suite. The status synchronization check only validates option rows, and no fixture exercises the documented namespace or configuration forms. As a result, compiler behavior can drift from this detailed ✅ claim without causing the suite to fail, despite the page's stated guarantee. Adding representative module fixtures or narrowing that guarantee would prevent stale status documentation.
Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!
Summary
Verification
git diff --checkpackages/less/package.jsonis5.0.0-alpha.9🤖 Generated with Codex